2014考研英語(yǔ)一閱讀text4原文出處：華爾街日?qǐng)?bào)在線

• 2026考研英語(yǔ)全程班 6班
• 26考研全科上岸規(guī)劃營(yíng)「擇校▪規(guī)劃▪備考」
• 2026考研專業(yè)課復(fù)習(xí)資料「真題▪筆記▪講義▪題庫(kù)」

今年的英語(yǔ)一第四篇文章是一篇時(shí)效非常強(qiáng)的文章，節(jié)選自The Wall Street Journal Online華爾街日?qǐng)?bào)在線，是去年2013年7月1日發(fā)布的文章。下面是文章的全文呈現(xiàn)，只是真題把原文中最后四段合成了一段。文章的結(jié)構(gòu)非常完整，設(shè)題的角度也和歷年真題如出一轍。

Illiberal Education and the 'Heart of the Matter'

Monday, July 1st, 2013

From The Wall Street Journal Online

‘The Heart of the Matter,” the just-released report by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, deserves praise for affirming the importance of the humanities and social sciences to the prosperity and security of liberal democracy in America. Regrettably, however, the report’s failure to address the true nature of the crisis facing liberal education may cause more harm than good.

In 2010, leading congressional Democrats and Republicans sent letters to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences asking that it identify actions that could be taken by “federal, state and local governments, universities, foundations, educators, individual benefactors and others” to “maintain national excellence in humanities and social scientific scholarship and education.”

In response, the American Academy formed the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences, with Duke University President Richard Brodhead and retired Exelon CEO John Rowe as co-chairmen. Among the commission’s 51 members are top-tier-university presidents, scholars, lawyers, judges, and business executives, as well as prominent figures from diplomacy, filmmaking, music and journalism.

The goals identified in the report are generally admirable. Because representative government presupposes an informed citizenry, the report supports full literacy; stresses the study of history and government, particularly American history and American government; and encourages the use of new digital technologies.

To encourage innovation and competition, the report calls for increased investment in research, the crafting of coherent curricula that improve students’ ability to solve problems and communicate effectively in the 21st century, increased funding for teachers and the encouragement of scholars to bring their learning to bear on the great challenges of the day. The report also advocates greater study of foreign languages, international affairs and the expansion of study abroad programs.

One of the more novel ideas in the report is the creation of a order viagra “Culture Corps” in cities and town across America to “transmit humanistic and social scientific expertise from one generation to the next.”

Unfortunately, despite 2½ years in the making, “The Heart of the Matter” never gets to the heart of the matter: the illiberal nature of liberal education at our leading colleges and universities.

The commission ignores that for several decades America’s colleges and universities have produced graduates who don’t know the content and character of liberal education and are thus deprived of its benefits. Sadly, the spirit of inquiry once at home on campus has been replaced by the use of the humanities and social sciences as vehicles for disseminating “progressive,” or left-liberal propaganda.

We know from the extensive documentation that William F. Buckley Jr. provided in his stellar critique of American academia, “God and Man at Yale,” first published in 1951, that this propagandizing extends back at least to the middle of the 20th century.

Today, professors routinely treat the progressive interpretation of history and progressive public policy as the proper subject of study while portraying conservative or classical liberal ideas—such as free markets, self-reliance and a distrust of central planning—as falling outside the boundaries of routine, and sometimes legitimate, intellectual investigation.

Meanwhile, courses proliferate on highly specialized topics—Muslims in movies, gay and lesbian gardeners, the mathematical formalization of political decision making, for example—that closely correspond to professors’ niche research interests but contribute little to students’ grasp of the broad sweep of Western civilization and its literary, philosophical and religious masterpieces.

Through speech codes, endless seminars and workshops designed to teach students how to avoid “offensive” speech—and by handling sexual harassment and sexual-assault allegations with procedures that undermine the presumption of innocence—universities teach students to discount free speech and due process.

The American Academy of Arts and Sciences displays great enthusiasm for liberal education. Yet its report may well set back reform by obscuring the depth and breadth of the challenge that Congress asked it to illuminate.

From The Wall Street Journal Online